[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312110557.GF30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:05:57 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@...il.com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach_omap2: use PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR + PTR_ERR
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:58:29AM +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote:
> This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/fb.c | 5 +----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c | 5 +----
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> index 1ec7f05..2a0816e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int __init omap3_l3_init(void)
>
> WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name);
>
> - return IS_ERR(pdev) ? PTR_ERR(pdev) : 0;
> + return PTR_RET(pdev);
This is incorrect.
The return value will be tested for < 0. Kernel pointers in general are
all above 3GB, and so are all "< 0".
I'm afraid none of these changes stuff is an improvement - they all
introduce bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists