linux-kernel - Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130312132811.GI18595@thunk.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:28:11 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> 
> Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel.  We
> don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
> backporting it I think.

I'll check, bu I suspect it will require an explicit backport; it's
not going to apply cleanly automatically, will it?  

(i.e., if we include cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, are there some
prerequisite patches that will also have to be backported, and/or we
will need manually fix up patch conflicts, right?)

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/