[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312134032.GU4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:40:32 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
Cc: mturquette@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] clk: Add notifier support in
clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:37:41AM -0700, Bill Huang wrote:
> Add the below four notifier events so drivers which are interested in
> knowing the clock status can act accordingly. This is extremely useful
> in some of the DVFS (Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling) design.
>
> PRE_CLK_ENABLE
> POST_CLK_ENABLE
> PRE_CLK_DISABLE
> POST_CLK_DISABLE
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
NAK. *Sigh* NO, this is the wrong level to be doing stuff like this.
The *ONLY* thing that clk_prepare_enable() and clk_prepare_disable() should
*EVER* be doing is calling clk_prepare(), clk_enable(), clk_disable() and
clk_unprepare(). Those two functions are *merely* helpers for drivers
who don't wish to make the individual calls.
Drivers are still completely free to call the individual functions, at
which point your proposal breaks horribly - and they _do_ call the
individual functions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists