[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y5dsheqo.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:55 -0400
From: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: Regulator API ignored return values
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Need add regulator_put here since regulator_get has succeed?
>
> Hmm, we still don't actually bail out if the error is encountered, so
> the reference count is balanced with the current patch, but I maybe
> a failed regulator_enable() should actually be a fatal error?
The reason I didn't make it a fatal error is that this is just vqmmc
(responsible for moving from 3.3V to 1.8V for UHS modes), not the
main vmmc regulator. We can just disable those UHS modes from the
capabilities on the host if vqmmc is missing, or failed to enable,
or doesn't support those voltages, and that's what the code does now.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists