[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49boaov5pi.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:22:17 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
Joakim.Tjernlund@...nsmode.se, arnd@...db.de, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/aio_abi.h
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:47:33PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
>> In the UAPI header files, __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN must be compared
>> against __BYTE_ORDER in preprocessor conditionals where these are exposed to
>> userspace (that is they're not inside __KERNEL__ conditionals).
>>
>> However, in the main kernel the norm is to check for "defined(__XXX_ENDIAN)"
>> rather than comparing against __BYTE_ORDER and this has incorrectly leaked
>> into the userspace headers.
>>
>> The definition of PADDED() in linux/aio_abi.h is wrong in this way. Note that
>> userspace will likely interpret this and thus the order of fields in struct
>> iocb incorrectly as the little-endian variant on big-endian machines -
>> depending on header inclusion order.
>>
>> [!!!] NOTE [!!!] This patch may adversely change the userspace API. It might
>> be better to fix the ordering of aio_key and aio_reserved1 in struct iocb.
>
> It is unlikely that anyone has used the existing kernel headers and hit this
> issue given that most existing users use the libaio.h include (which does not
> get the endianness tests wrong). Given that the kernel has always used the
> correct endian mappings, this change is correct.
Agreed.
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists