[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzmATkP-W0uX1a_gP7E1fwcp2Mh4537Ou2uwHDixNKPTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:20:19 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Feng Hong <hongfeng@...vell.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Subject: Re: Regression with orderly_poweroff()
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Confused... which arguments? The only argument is poweroff_cmd, it can't
> go away and kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) is fine in work->func() ?
Hmm. I guess in this particular situation, we really don't have any
arguments from callers, no. I was confused by the fact that we had
that argv_split/argv_free thing, but that doesn't actually come from
the callers, it just comes from our own buffer. So yeah, I guess
everything could just go into a workqueue.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists