[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312192702.GQ15375@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:27:02 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Add support for ARMv7-M's NVIC
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:01:01PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > +#include <asm/irq.h>
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
>
> linux/io.h
>
> > + unsigned int irqs, i, irq_base;
> > +
> > + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 16, irqs - 16, numa_node_id());
> > + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(irq_base)) {
>
> Erm... irq_alloc_descs() returns a negative number on error.
>
> if ((int)irq_base < 0)
>
> or make irq_base an int, and use:
>
> if (irq_base < 0)
Just for me: So the check using IS_ERR_VALUE is as wrong as the other
occurences in arch/arm that you just kicked out or is it just ugly?
I thought about it and went the "make irq_base int" route (and even
fixed the asm includes) even before I sent my patch. Just failed to pass
the right hash to format-patch after rebasing :-|
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists