[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513F8F80.1070409@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:26:40 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ssbi: Use regular init level
On 03/12/13 11:41, David Brown wrote:
> With device tree, and deferred probe, it is no longer necessary to
> make sure that the ssbi bus driver is initialized very early. Restore
> to a regular module_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> index 7ae8925..6878e55 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __init msm_ssbi_init(void)
> {
> return platform_driver_register(&msm_ssbi_driver);
> }
> -postcore_initcall(msm_ssbi_init);
> +module_init(msm_ssbi_init);
>
> static void __exit msm_ssbi_exit(void)
> {
With this change we can use module_platform_driver() too.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists