[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871ubkz42p.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:43:58 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vasily Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: For review: pid_namespaces(7) man page (draft 2)
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> writes:
> Eric et al.,
>
> [CCing Li because of reboot(2) changes]
>
> I have (I think) addressed all previous comments in the current draft
> of the pid_namespaces(7) page. This is a final sanity check before I
> call this page complete (modulo any future kernel changes).
Baring the 3.9 reference to reboot(2) which should be 3.4 I don't see
any problems.
I think you have reached the point where if there are any problems left
I will just have to send you patches after you publish because my eyes
are glassing over and I am not going to see any more problems right now.
One of those patches I am going to have to send you is I am fixing the
case below for 3.10
> clone(..., CLONE_VM, ...);
> setns(fd, CLONE_NEWPID); /* Fails */
>
> clone(..., CLONE_VM, ...);
> unshare(CLONE_NEWPID); /* Fails */
>
It turns out that the check in fork/clone is sufficient.
The verbage about all of the namespaces is correct however since
unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) doesn't actually change the pid_namespace it
doesn't matter.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists