[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312221336.GA25699@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:13:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] KDB: add more exports for supporting KDB modules
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:03:17PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> Let me see if I can understand the concept better. By denying
> an external hardware vendor the use of KDB to support a significant
> piece of proprietary hardware on Linux, I furthering the interests
> of Linux and the community how?
Did SGI lawyers really agree to this patch? I consider you running this
by them if you have any questions as to why we are objecting to this.
If, after discussing it with them, they still are asking for this
change, please resend it, with their signed-off-by: on it showing that
they really want this change.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists