[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312230950.GA10222@feng-snb>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:09:50 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] timekeeping: utilize the suspend-nonstop
clocksource to count suspended time
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:09:08PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 03/11/2013 08:56 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> }
> >- /* re-base the last cycle value */
> >- tk->clock->cycle_last = tk->clock->read(tk->clock);
> >+
> >+ if (suspendtime_found)
> >+ __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta);
> >+
> >+ /* Re-base the last cycle value */
> >+ clock->cycle_last = clock->read(clock);
> It seems like since we unconditionally read the clock above, this
> last line could be reworked to be:
> clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
>
> Which would save re-reading the clocksource.
>
> If you don't have any objections I'll fold that small change into
> your patch.
No objection at all. Thanks!
- Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists