linux-kernel - [ 018/100] btrfs: Init io_lock after cloning btrfs device struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130312223124.963385366@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:31:03 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
Subject: [ 018/100] btrfs: Init io_lock after cloning btrfs device struct

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit 1cba0cdf5e4dbcd9e5fa5b54d7a028e55e2ca057 upstream.

__btrfs_close_devices() clones btrfs device structs with
memcpy(). Some of the fields in the clone are reinitialized, but it's
missing to init io_lock. In mainline this goes unnoticed, but on RT it
leaves the plist pointing to the original about to be freed lock
struct.

Initialize io_lock after cloning, so no references to the original
struct are left.

Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ static int __btrfs_close_devices(struct
 		new_device->writeable = 0;
 		new_device->in_fs_metadata = 0;
 		new_device->can_discard = 0;
+		spin_lock_init(&new_device->io_lock);
 		list_replace_rcu(&device->dev_list, &new_device->dev_list);
 
 		call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/