linux-kernel - [ 020/100] Btrfs: delete inline extents when we find them during logging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130312223125.197472423@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:31:05 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Subject: [ 020/100] Btrfs: delete inline extents when we find them during logging

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>

commit 124fe663f93162d17b7e391705cac122101e93d8 upstream.

Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size.  To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item.  This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -3281,6 +3281,7 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_t
 	int ret;
 	bool skip_csum = BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM;
 
+insert:
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ordered_sums);
 	btrfs_init_map_token(&token);
 	key.objectid = btrfs_ino(inode);
@@ -3296,6 +3297,23 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_t
 	leaf = path->nodes[0];
 	fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
 			    struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
+
+	/*
+	 * If we are overwriting an inline extent with a real one then we need
+	 * to just delete the inline extent as it may not be large enough to
+	 * have the entire file_extent_item.
+	 */
+	if (ret && btrfs_token_file_extent_type(leaf, fi, &token) ==
+	    BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
+		ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, log, path);
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
+		if (ret) {
+			path->really_keep_locks = 0;
+			return ret;
+		}
+		goto insert;
+	}
+
 	btrfs_set_token_file_extent_generation(leaf, fi, em->generation,
 					       &token);
 	if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/