[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363169039.3137.186.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:03:59 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>,
Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 13 March 2013 09:59, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > 3) What is the current status of the (out of tree) code that adds
> > RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X?
>
> They are now present in 3.9-rc1, see a0b0197c (more specifically
> 85639910..d3d2b420) :)
Great.
> The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they
> should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X).
Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X!
Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert
RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued
for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists