[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514060B5.8060301@openwrt.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:19:17 +0100
From: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
To: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
CC: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>,
Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X
On 13/03/13 11:35, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 13 March 2013 11:03, Paul Bolle<pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they
>>> should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X).
>> Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X!
> Ah, yes, the inital submission only included RT305X support, not
> RT288X (and neither of the newer chips). These will come later.
>
>> Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert
>> RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued
>> for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct?
> Yes, that should be everything. John Crispin, anything missing from that?
>
>
> Jonas
>
>
Hi,
I will look into this later this week.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists