linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] usb: phy: nop: Add some parameters to platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5140A0C0.2020400@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:52:32 +0100
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
CC:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, balbi@...com, tony@...mide.com,
	mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] usb: phy: nop: Add some parameters to platform data

On 03/13/2013 04:17 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 04:20 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Adding Peter to the loop. I faintly remember him mentioning this issue before
>> for beagle. We really need the deferred probe mechanism or we need to resort
>> to device registering order.
> 
> Yes, BeagleBoard is a good example. Long story short: we have external
> dependency and the correct way to handle that is via deferred probe.

Sure.

> As of now we are not ready to kill the legacy support but over time we should
> move as much as we can to DT only mode.

I was assuming you're already on DT only :)

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)