[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5140A7F2.5080203@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:23:14 +0100
From: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.6.11: khubd issue SLAB related?
On 2013-03-11 22:23, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>
>> [3663200.799579] SLAB: Unable to allocate memory on node 0 (gfp=0xd0)
>> [3663200.799581] cache: size-65536, object size: 65536, order: 4
>> [3663200.799583] node 0: slabs: 6/6, objs: 6/6, free: 0
>> [3663200.799585] pwc: Oops, could not allocate memory for pwc_device.
>
> You have memory freed, but like your earlier page allocation failure on
> mount, it is too fragmented. This is an order-4 page allocation, the
> kmalloc() of struct pwc_device, and you don't even have any order-3 pages
> that are available. Are you running with CONFIG_COMPACTION enabled?
Yes.
> If not, enable it and try again, or get root and manually try to
> defragment memory by doing echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
This needs to be done regularly, I assume?
> If so, try killing a memory hogging process to free some memory and
> attempt to get some higher order pages available.
It's a 8GB box (7.5GB available to software) with modest load. Mostly
email & web browsing, some torrents, nntp stuff, etc. Nothing weird.
Around 4.8G in buffers/cache right now.
Why is this issue occurring?
Why did I not see this in the past?
Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists