linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: mux: Add i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec 'mux' driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5140B778.7090401@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:29:28 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Girish Shivananjappa <girish.shivananjappa@...aro.org>,
	"bhushan.r" <bhushan.r@...sung.com>,
	Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
	"sreekumar.c" <sreekumar.c@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
	Yuvaraj Kumar <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
	Prashanth G <prashanth.g@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: mux: Add i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec 'mux' driver

On 03/13/2013 10:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>>> Changes in v4: None
>>
>> Isn't this 'PATCH V3 REPOST' then?
> 
> In this case part 2 in the patch series changes but not parts 1 and 3.
>  I could have just reposted part 2 with a higher version, but that
> makes it a little harder to piece together all of the parts of the
> series so I decided to repost all 3.  I can do differently in the
> future if you prefer, but my understanding was that it was a matter of
> preference/judgement call.

Oh no you're quite right. I didn't notice it was a 3-part series, since
I only got patch 1/3 filtered into my inbox; I guess I wasn't CC'd on
the rest. Sorry for the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/