lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1363202966-28436-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:29:26 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Verify device status after eject

ACPI spec states that the OS evaluates _STA after calling _EJ0
in order to verify if eject was successful.  Added a check to
verify if the enabled bit of the status value is cleared after
_EJ0.

Note, the present bit is not checked since some FW implementations
do not clear the present bit until the hardware is physically
removed.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
---

This patch is based on linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 4f2265e..31d1242 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
 	union acpi_object arg;
 	acpi_status status;
+	unsigned long long sta;
 
 	/* If there is no handle, the device node has been unregistered. */
 	if (!handle) {
@@ -164,10 +165,25 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 		if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
 			return -ENODEV;
 		} else {
-			acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject failed\n");
+			acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject failed (0x%x)\n",
+								status);
 			return -EIO;
 		}
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Verify if eject was indeed successful.  If not, log an error
+	 * message.  No need to call _OST since _EJ0 call was made OK.
+	 */
+	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+			"Status check after eject failed (0x%x)\n", status);
+	} else if (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+			"Eject incomplete - status 0x%llx\n", sta);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ