[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130313140102.234330566fd08a0c8e4e2732@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:01:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, simon.jeons@...il.com,
ric.masonn@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: limit growth of 3% hardcoded other user
reserve
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:55:53 -0500 Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@...il.com> wrote:
> Should I enforce a minimum for the admin reserve? 8MB/128MB for the
> overcommit guess/never modes? I was hesitant to do that since my
> numbers are based a full-featured distro's versions of login, bash,
> etc. A more svelte distro based on BusyBox might want different
> minimums.
I'd say not. It requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN and we generally prefer to give
root the flexibility to shoot his foot off if he feels so inclined.
> I have a question concerning the variable names. Might a person
> looking at the source be confused why admin_reserve_kbytes and
> user_reserve_kbytes are not included in totalreserve_pages? Should
> I use a word other than "reserve" in the names, like "safetynet"?
> I can't think of anything better. Maybe it isn't a concern, but
> I didn't want to cause confusion.
mm.. I wouldn't worry about it personally. As long as we have nice
comments at the various definition sites, readers should be able to
work out the difference quite easily.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists