[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3174774.7AKCbYrzc6@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:41:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 08:55:12 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 March 2013 07:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > One more question before I apply it.
> >
> > Is there any architecture/platform that will set
> > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES and keep have_multiple_policies unset
> > at the same time?
>
> No, they are redundant. That's why i have been forcing to drop this patch.
I see.
What about having the Kconfig option alone, however?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists