linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: rename worker_pool->assoc_mutex to ->manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOS58YNSWsjaRpqnwL81=DJebs+ZHth9LDwnKdV_09t08AqL0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:41:18 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: rename worker_pool->assoc_mutex to ->manager_mutex

Hey, Lai.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com> wrote:
>> @@ -4095,7 +4109,7 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>                 pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
>>
>>                 spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
>> -               mutex_unlock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
>> +               mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
>
> Hi, Tejun
>
> It must conflicts with wq/for-3.9-fixes.

Yeah, the resolution is trivial. I'll be carrying it in for-next once
this makes for-3.10.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/