[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130315064331.GC12559@zurbaran>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:43:31 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: remove __exit_p annotation for
twl4030_madc_remove
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:56:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 4740f73fe5 "mfd: remove use of __devexit" removed the __devexit annotation
> on the twl4030_madc_remove function, but left an __exit_p() present on the
> pointer to this function. Using __exit_p was as wrong with the devexit in
> place as it is now, but now we get a gcc warning about an unused function.
>
> In order for the twl4030_madc_remove to work correctly in built-in code, we
> have to remove the __exit_p.
>
> Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>
> Please apply to MFD tree for 3.9
>
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to mfd-fixes.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists