linux-kernel - Re: [RFC V1 0/8] Add a driver for somagic smi2021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:08:58 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Jon Arne Jørgensen <jonarne@...arne.no>
Cc:	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hverkuil@...all.nl, elezegarcia@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 0/8] Add a driver for somagic smi2021

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:06:56PM +0100, Jon Arne Jørgensen wrote:
> This patch-set will add a driver for the Somagic SMI2021 chip.
> 
> This chip is found inside different usb video-capture devices.
> Most of them are branded as EasyCap, but there also seems to be
> some other brands selling devices with this chip.
> 
> This driver is split into two modules, where one is called smi2021-bootloader,
> and the other is just called smi2021.
> 
> The bootloader is responsible for the upload of a firmware that is needed by some
> versions of the devices.
> 
> All Somagic devices that need firmware seems to identify themselves
> with the usb product id 0x0007. There is no way for the kernel to know
> what firmware to upload to the device without user interaction.
> 
> If there is only one firmware present on the computer, the kernel
> will upload that firmware to any device that identifies as 0x0007.
> If there are multiple Somagic firmwares present, the user will have to pass
> a module parameter to the smi2021-bootloader module to tell what firmware to use.
> 

Nice job!

I have some minor comments on each patch, but also I don't agree
with the patch splitting: what's the point in splitting and sending
one patch per file?

It doesn't make it any easier to review, so why don't you just
send one patch: "Introduce smi2021 driver"?

The rule is one patch per change, and I believe this whole patchset
is just one change: adding a new driver.

-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/