| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:24:05 +0100 From: Thomas COUDRAY <amanone@...il.com> To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org> Subject: Re: lgetxattr()/getxattr() return different values on a file labelled with selinux disabled 2013/3/15 Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>: > f is truly a regular file and not a symlink pointing to a regular file? f is a truly regular file. > before_t and after_t are both defined in the policy? Only before_t was defined in the policy. When I define after_t in the policy, both commands return the same label (after_t). But I wouldn't expect this to make a difference in the output of both commands (as the only visible difference is lgetxattr() vs getxattr()) > before_t and after_t are not type aliases of each other? They are not. > What are the credentials (capabilities and SELinux security > context/permissions) of the process running the ls and getfattr commands? It has unconfined_u:unconfined_r:before_t label with before_t type. Same as the file f. The process has full SELinux rights on both command and file. > Any relevant messages from SELinux in dmesg output? No avc warnings in dmesg and audit.log. All looks good. -- Thomas Coudray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists