[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1363364801-23684-1-git-send-email-ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:56:41 +0530
From: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>
To: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
naveenkrishna.ch@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de
Subject: [RFC: PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Handle timeout and race
conditions
This patch does the following
1. Handle the return values of wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
2. Add spin locks to avoid race conditions during ISR.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
---
Discussion thread for this patch can be found at
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1693284?page=last
I've not seen any reference to spin lock usage in IIO.
Kindly, suggest me if there is a better way to avoid the race.
Thanks,
Naveen
drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
index ed6fdd7..4de28ae 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct exynos_adc {
struct completion completion;
+ spinlock_t reg_lock;
u32 value;
unsigned int version;
};
@@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
long mask)
{
struct exynos_adc *info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
- unsigned long timeout;
+ long timeout;
u32 con1, con2;
if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
@@ -143,15 +144,19 @@ static int exynos_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
ADC_V1_CON(info->regs));
}
+ INIT_COMPLETION(info->completion);
+
timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
(&info->completion, EXYNOS_ADC_TIMEOUT);
+
*val = info->value;
mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
if (timeout == 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
-
+ else if (timeout < 0)
+ return timeout;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
@@ -159,6 +164,8 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_adc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct exynos_adc *info = (struct exynos_adc *)dev_id;
+ spin_lock(&info->reg_lock);
+
/* Read value */
info->value = readl(ADC_V1_DATX(info->regs)) &
ADC_DATX_MASK;
@@ -170,6 +177,8 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_adc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
complete(&info->completion);
+ spin_unlock(&info->reg_lock);
+
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -327,6 +336,7 @@ static int exynos_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
else
indio_dev->num_channels = MAX_ADC_V2_CHANNELS;
+ spin_lock_init(&info->reg_lock);
ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
if (ret)
goto err_irq;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists