[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F0020980106B9E@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:43:48 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/10] drivers: misc: use module_platform_driver_probe()
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
>> This patch converts the drivers to use the
>> module_platform_driver_probe() macro which makes the code smaller and
>> a bit simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@...il.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.c | 12 +-----------
>> drivers/misc/ep93xx_pwm.c | 13 +------------
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> The patch itself seems fine, but there are two issues around it:
>
> * The PWM drivers should really get moved to drivers/pwm and converted to the new
> PWM subsystem. I don't know if Hartley or Hans-Christian have plans to do
> that already.
Arnd,
Ill look at converting the ep93xx pwm driver to the PWM subsystem. The only issue is
the current driver exposes a sysfs interface that I think is not available in that subsystem.
>* Regarding the use of module_platform_driver_probe, I'm a little worried about
> the interactions with deferred probing. I don't think there are any regressions,
> but we should probably make people aware that one cannot return -EPROBE_DEFER
> from a platform_driver_probe function.
The ep93xx pwm driver does not need to use platform_driver_probe(). It can be changed
to use module_platform_driver() by just moving the .probe to the platform_driver. This
driver was added before module_platform_driver() was available and I used the
platform_driver_probe() thinking it would save a couple lines of code.
I'll change this in a bit. Right now I'm trying to work out why kernel 3.8 is not booting
on the ep93xx. I had 3.6.6 on my development board and 3.7 works fine but 3.8 hangs
without uncompressing the kernel.
Regards,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists