[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130316203221.GT11268@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:32:21 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Feng Hong <hongfeng@...vell.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] finx argv_split() vs sysctl race
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:23:27PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > To remind, say, argv_split(poweroff_cmd) can race with sysctl changing this
> > string, in this case it can write to the memory after argv[] array. We can
> > fix this, or we can rewrite argv_split/free:
>
> OK, please see 1/2.
>
> And this reminds me about set_task_comm() which pretends it does something
> meaningful for the reader of the mutable ->comm, see the offtopic 2/2.
I had "rcu strings" to handle the sysctl string race problem in a
generic way some time ago.
http://lwn.net/Articles/368684/
Unfortunately never made it in. Perhaps it should be revisited.
In fact I believe the old patchkit fixed the reboot command race.
-andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists