linux-kernel - Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when it should not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:16:11 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Martin Walch <walch.martin@....de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAMster selects HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE on 64 bit systems when
 it should not

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Walch wrote:
> > 64_BIT should probably say 64BIT which has corresponding config sections in 
> > arch/{x86,ia64,mips,s390,tile,alpha,arm64,sparc,parisc,powerpc}/Kconfig and 
> > arch/x86/um/Kconfig.
> > 
> > I do not know if there are any bad consequences about this, but I guess this 
> > should be reviewed and fixed, probably by just removing the underscore from 
> > 64_BIT in drivers/staging/zcache/Kconfig.
> 
> It's an obvious typo. See the patch I sent last week:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/9/106 . I have not yet received any
> feedback.

Your patch is in my "to-apply" queue that I should get to soon.  It's
only 137 patches back at the moment...

thanks,

greg "my queue is bigger than yours" k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/