[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM16m2n_Of0MJNtUsrL0MS2cXBZUHg9RzjSHcboDiHKB3s0cdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:32:43 +0800
From: chpoph <chpoph@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: udelay function delays the wrong time interval in multiprocessor
system, if ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER is not defined and on current timer is used.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> We don't support different CPUs running at different frequencies with
> the delay loop. Sorry.
Does it means that a timer-based delay implementation must be used to
get an accurate delay in SMP. I think it should print a warning
message if the CPU delay loop is used in SMP. In my system, the wrong
delay interval fluctuated with CPU frequencies caused a control
problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists