linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 9/9] x86, mm, numa, acpi: Memblock limit with movablemem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1363430142-14563-10-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:35:42 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	wency@...fujitsu.com, trenn@...e.de, liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, walken@...gle.com, riel@...hat.com,
	khlebnikov@...nvz.org, tj@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mina86@...a86.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, linfeng@...fujitsu.com,
	jiang.liu@...wei.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 9/9] x86, mm, numa, acpi: Memblock limit with movablemem_map

Ensure memblock will not allocate memory from areas that may be
ZONE_MOVABLE. The map info is from movablemem_map boot option.

The following problem was reported by Stephen Rothwell:
The definition of struct movablecore_map is protected by
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP but its use in memblock_overlaps_region()
is not. So add CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to protect the use of
movablecore_map in memblock_overlaps_region().

Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 include/linux/memblock.h |    2 +
 mm/memblock.c            |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index f388203..3e5ecb2 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct memblock {
 
 extern struct memblock memblock;
 extern int memblock_debug;
+extern struct movablemem_map movablemem_map;
 
 #define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
 	if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
+
 void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
 			  unsigned long *out_end_pfn, int *out_nid);
 
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b8d9147..1bcd9b9 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -92,9 +92,58 @@ static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
  *
  * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
  *
+ * If we have CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP defined, we need to check if the
+ * memory we found if not in hotpluggable ranges.
+ *
  * RETURNS:
  * Found address on success, %0 on failure.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
+					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
+					phys_addr_t align, int nid)
+{
+	phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand;
+	u64 i;
+	int curr = movablemem_map.nr_map - 1;
+
+	/* pump up @end */
+	if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
+		end = memblock.current_limit;
+
+	/* avoid allocating the first page */
+	start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
+	end = max(start, end);
+
+	for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(i, nid, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+		this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end);
+		this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end);
+
+restart:
+		if (this_end <= this_start || this_end < size)
+			continue;
+
+		for (; curr >= 0; curr--) {
+			if ((movablemem_map.map[curr].start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)
+			    < this_end)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		cand = round_down(this_end - size, align);
+		if (curr >= 0 &&
+		    cand < movablemem_map.map[curr].end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) {
+			this_end = movablemem_map.map[curr].start_pfn
+				   << PAGE_SHIFT;
+			goto restart;
+		}
+
+		if (cand >= this_start)
+			return cand;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
 phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
 					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
 					phys_addr_t align, int nid)
@@ -123,6 +172,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
 
 /**
  * memblock_find_in_range - find free area in given range
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/