lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 07:36:22 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@...sync.net>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, dormando <dormando@...ia.net>, Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> writes: > > To avoid infinite looping for high-order allocation requests kswapd will > not reclaim for high-order allocations when it has reclaimed at least > twice the number of pages as the allocation request. Will this make higher order allocations fail earlier? Or does compaction still kick in early enough. I understand the motivation. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists