linux-kernel - [ 69/82] Fix: compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() misuse in aio, readv, writev, and security keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130318042150.936654279@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:22:53 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [ 69/82] Fix: compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() misuse in aio, readv, writev,
 and security keys

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>

commit 8aec0f5d4137532de14e6554fd5dd201ff3a3c49 upstream.

Looking at mm/process_vm_access.c:process_vm_rw() and comparing it to
compat_process_vm_rw() shows that the compatibility code requires an
explicit "access_ok()" check before calling
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(). The same difference seems to appear when
we compare fs/read_write.c:do_readv_writev() to
fs/compat.c:compat_do_readv_writev().

This subtle difference between the compat and non-compat requirements
should probably be debated, as it seems to be error-prone. In fact,
there are two others sites that use this function in the Linux kernel,
and they both seem to get it wrong:

Now shifting our attention to fs/aio.c, we see that aio_setup_iocb()
also ends up calling compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() through
aio_setup_vectored_rw(). Unfortunately, the access_ok() check appears to
be missing. Same situation for
security/keys/compat.c:compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov().

I propose that we add the access_ok() check directly into
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(), so callers don't have to worry about it,
and it therefore makes the compat call code similar to its non-compat
counterpart. Place the access_ok() check in the same location where
copy_from_user() can trigger a -EFAULT error in the non-compat code, so
the ABI behaviors are alike on both compat and non-compat.

While we are here, fix compat_do_readv_writev() so it checks for
compat_rw_copy_check_uvector() negative return values.

And also, fix a memory leak in compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov() error
handling.

Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/compat.c            |   15 +++++++--------
 mm/process_vm_access.c |    8 --------
 security/keys/compat.c |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -572,6 +572,10 @@ ssize_t compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(int
 	}
 	*ret_pointer = iov;

+	ret = -EFAULT;
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uvector, nr_segs*sizeof(*uvector)))
+		goto out;
+
 	/*
 	 * Single unix specification:
 	 * We should -EINVAL if an element length is not >= 0 and fitting an
@@ -1103,17 +1107,12 @@ static ssize_t compat_do_readv_writev(in
 	if (!file->f_op)
 		goto out;

-	ret = -EFAULT;
-	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uvector, nr_segs*sizeof(*uvector)))
-		goto out;
-
-	tot_len = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, uvector, nr_segs,
+	ret = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(type, uvector, nr_segs,
 					       UIO_FASTIOV, iovstack, &iov, 1);
-	if (tot_len == 0) {
-		ret = 0;
+	if (ret <= 0)
 		goto out;
-	}

+	tot_len = ret;
 	ret = rw_verify_area(type, file, pos, tot_len);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
--- a/mm/process_vm_access.c
+++ b/mm/process_vm_access.c
@@ -434,12 +434,6 @@ compat_process_vm_rw(compat_pid_t pid,
 	if (flags != 0)
 		return -EINVAL;

-	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, lvec, liovcnt * sizeof(*lvec)))
-		goto out;
-
-	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, rvec, riovcnt * sizeof(*rvec)))
-		goto out;
-
 	if (vm_write)
 		rc = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(WRITE, lvec, liovcnt,
 						  UIO_FASTIOV, iovstack_l,
@@ -464,8 +458,6 @@ free_iovecs:
 		kfree(iov_r);
 	if (iov_l != iovstack_l)
 		kfree(iov_l);
-
-out:
 	return rc;
 }

--- a/security/keys/compat.c
+++ b/security/keys/compat.c
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ long compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov(
 					   ARRAY_SIZE(iovstack),
 					   iovstack, &iov, 1);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+		goto err;
 	if (ret == 0)
 		goto no_payload_free;

 	ret = keyctl_instantiate_key_common(id, iov, ioc, ret, ringid);
-
+err:
 	if (iov != iovstack)
 		kfree(iov);
 	return ret;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/