linux-kernel - [PATCH] f2fs: fix not to allocate max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1363586028-8617-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:53:48 +0900
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix not to allocate max_nid

The build_free_nid should not add free nids over nm_i->max_nid.
But, there was a hole that invalid free nid was added by the following scenario.

Let's suppose nm_i->max_nid = 150 and the last NAT page has 100 ~ 200 nids.

build_free_nids
  - get_current_nat_page loads the last NAT page
  - scan_nat_page can add 100 ~ 200 nids
    -> Bug here!
So, when scanning an NAT page, we should check each candidate whether it is
over max_nid or not.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index c60919f..3fb6dfe 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1270,6 +1270,8 @@ static int scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 	i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
 
 	for (; i < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++, start_nid++) {
+		if (start_nid >= nm_i->max_nid)
+			return fcnt;
 		blk_addr  = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
 		BUG_ON(blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
 		if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
-- 
1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/