[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5146D0E3.60401@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:31:31 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@....de>
CC: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization
for some laptops.
On 03/18/2013 04:22 PM, Danny Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> index 313f959..9c33871 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
>>> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
>>> int level);
>>> static int acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(
>>> struct acpi_video_device *device,
>>> - unsigned long long *level, int init);
>>> + unsigned long long *level, int raw);
>>
>> Why not bool?
>
> For two reasons:
> - It previous was int ;-)
Right, but since we are doing something now, we can probably change it
for better :-)
> - It allowed the invocations of this function to fit within one 80-char
> line.
the unsigned long long for level made me curious, do we really need that?
int would suffice I think.
>
> Neither reason is terribly strong, so if you prefer, I can convert this
> argument to bool.
It's OK, I can do the cleaup some time later.
Thanks,
Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists