linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix ring_buffer perf_output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363612263.22553.12.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:11:03 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix ring_buffer perf_output_space() boundary
 calculation

On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:03 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 13:48 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >>         if (!rb->writable)
> >> -               return true;
> >> +               return false;
> >
> >
> > writable means user writable (VM_WRITE); the difference is that a
> > !VM_WRITE buffer will simply over-write its own tail whereas a VM_WRITE
> > buffer will drop events.
> >
> > So returning true for !VM_WRITE makes sense, there's always space.
> >
> Ok, that was not so clear to me. I think this if() statment deserves a comment.
> I will add that in V2.

Thanks; I suppose renaming the entire ->writable thing might be better
though. Something like ->overwrite or so.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/