[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51473179.2030306@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:23:37 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
On 03/17/2013 10:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tegra tree got a conflict in
> drivers/clocksource/tegra20_timer.c between commit 1d16cfb3aeba
> ("clocksource: tegra20: use the device_node pointer passed to
> init") from the arm-soc tree and commit 6f88fb8af6c6 ("clocksource:
> tegra: move to of_clk_get") from the tegra tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
Thanks. This resolution looks fine.
Arnd/Olof, do you want me to rebase the Tegra branch onto some arm-soc
branch to resolve this conflict, or are you happy to simply resolve it
as below when pulling the Tegra branches into arm-soc for 3.10?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists