[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130318152514.GG4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:25:14 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: chpoph <chpoph@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: udelay function delays the wrong time interval in
multiprocessor system, if ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER is not
defined and on current timer is used.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:40:56PM +0800, chpoph wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:05:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> >Do you actually have an ARM platform that can scale the CPU frequencies
> independently?
>
> Yes, my smart phone use Qualcomm's 8x25 and 8064 platform, which can
> scale the CPU frequencies independently. I test the delay loop, the
> phone can't get accurate delayed time intervals.
That is expected. udelay() is only approximate. Sometimes, it will give
you a slightly shorter delay than asked for, or if preempted, it can give
you a much longer delay - because it has no idea how long it has been
preempted for.
This is why in a SMP system it is much better to use a timer-based udelay()
implementation which is more independent of these effects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists