linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] vfs: export do_splice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130318153936.GB28508@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:39:36 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, jack@...e.cz,
	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apw@...onical.com,
	nbd@...nwrt.org, neilb@...e.de, jordipujolp@...il.com,
	ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu, sedat.dilek@...glemail.com,
	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] vfs: export do_splice_direct() to modules

On Sun 17-03-13 13:06:59, David Howells wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> 
> > Export do_splice_direct() to modules.  Needed by overlay filesystem.
> 
> Apparently you cannot call this from any function that is holding an i_mutex
> if the target of the splice uses generic_file_splice_write().
> 
> The problem is a potential deadlock situation:
> 
> We have places already that do:
> 
> 	mnt_want_write()
> 	mutex_lock()
> 
> This can be found in do_last() for example.
> 
> However, mnt_want_write() calls sb_start_write() as does
> generic_file_splice_write().  So now in ovl_copy_up_locked() you're adding:
> 
> 	mutex_lock()
> 	sb_start_write()
> 
> which lockdep reports as a potential ABBA deadlock.
> 
> Now, looking at __sb_start_write(), I'm not entirely sure how the deadlock
> might operate, so it's possible that this is a false alarm.  Maybe Jan Kara can
> illuminate further, so I've added him to the cc list.
  IMO the deadlock is real. In freeze_super() we wait for all writers to
the filesystem to finish while blocking beginning of any further writes. So
we have a deadlock scenario like:

  THREAD1		THREAD2				THREAD3
mnt_want_write()	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
...							freeze_super()
block on mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex)
							  sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
			block in sb_start_write()

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/