[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130318162650.GA20313@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:26:50 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel
threads
On 03/17, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:04 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > > I'm really thinking the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT flag is getting a bit
> > > ridiculous. We really should have a "swap syscall table when tracepoints
> > > enabled" that changes the syscall table that does exactly the same thing
> > > as the normal table but wraps the system call with the tracepoints.
> >
> > But we also need to force the slow path in system_call...
>
> Why? If we remove the tracepoint from the slowpath and use a table swap,
> then we wouldn't need to use the slowpath at all.
Ah, indeed, you are right.
> > Anyway, do you agree with this change for now?
>
> Well, if it's solving a bug today sure. But we should really be looking
> at fixing what's there for the future.
OK, thanks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists