[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BFB01C0A-95E5-4C2B-8AF2-A06BE1FF74E0@orcon.net.nz>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:11:15 +1300
From: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: makefile: don't enforce small data model for kernel builds
On 18/03/2013, at 10:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Due to all of the goodness being packed into today's kernels, the
> resulting image isn't as slim as it once was.
>
> In light of this, don't pass -msmall-data to the tools, which
> results in
> link failures due to impossible relocations when compiling anything
> but
> the most trivial configurations.
I think many of us have been using -mlarge-data when compiling with
gcc-4.6 or later so maybe it is time to get the change upstream.
The interesting thing is that the kernel still compiles fine with
gcc-4.5 and the relocation errors only appear if compiling with
gcc-4.6 or later. I had asked before on this forum what had changed
with gcc-4.6 that results in the extra usage of the small data area
but never got an answer. I am still curious to know.
BTW, the phrase "to the tools" in the commit message makes me think
immediately of the tools directory (containing perf, etc.) which is
not what is intended.
Matt: Are you able to collect up this and the other patches of Will
and get them sent to Linus?
Cheers
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists