[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUHtM_Nuz4ak+HeNGV6a-HTtfMkxc+zBZuow47Vj70CKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:52:52 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, penberg@...nel.org, jacob.shin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: add_pfn_range_mapped: use meaningful index to
teach clean_sort_range()
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Since add_range_with_merge() return the max none zero element of the array, it's
> suffice to use it to instruct clean_sort_range() to do the sort. Or the former
> assignment by add_range_with_merge() is nonsense because clean_sort_range()
> will produce a accurate number of the sorted array and it never depends on
> nr_pfn_mapped.
>
> Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 59b7fc4..55ae904 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void add_pfn_range_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> nr_pfn_mapped = add_range_with_merge(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX,
> nr_pfn_mapped, start_pfn, end_pfn);
> - nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, E820_X_MAX);
> + nr_pfn_mapped = clean_sort_range(pfn_mapped, nr_pfn_mapped);
>
> max_pfn_mapped = max(max_pfn_mapped, end_pfn);>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists