[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUEf3JriFoSGtG+xzzuagyf_8Rkd9Mc-0uKe=ivYxgE=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:05:24 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> Thinking more about it, if ongoing DMA is an issue, then setting up
> software iotlb in those areas is also prone to being overwritten by
> those DMAs. Hence, reserving memory low where no DMA is setup by first
> kernel, seems somewhat safer.
So stick with crashkernel_low ? aka if system does not support iommu
with kdump, they need to append
crashkernel_low in first kernel.
I think that could be way to force vendor to double check to find out
why their system does not support
iommu with kdump.
BTW, our systems do support iommu with kdump without problem.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists