[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130318042147.807596536@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:22:21 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
Subject: [ 37/82] tty: Correct tty buffer flush.
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
commit 64325a3be08d364a62ee8f84b2cf86934bc2544a upstream.
The root of problem is carelessly zeroing pointer(in function __tty_buffer_flush()),
when another thread can use it. It can be cause of "NULL pointer dereference".
Main idea of the patch, this is never free last (struct tty_buffer) in the active buffer.
Only flush the data for ldisc(buf->head->read = buf->head->commit).
At that moment driver can collect(write) data in buffer without conflict.
It is repeat behavior of flush_to_ldisc(), only without feeding data to ldisc.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -114,11 +114,14 @@ static void __tty_buffer_flush(struct tt
{
struct tty_buffer *thead;
- while ((thead = tty->buf.head) != NULL) {
- tty->buf.head = thead->next;
- tty_buffer_free(tty, thead);
+ if (tty->buf.head == NULL)
+ return;
+ while ((thead = tty->buf.head->next) != NULL) {
+ tty_buffer_free(tty, tty->buf.head);
+ tty->buf.head = thead;
}
- tty->buf.tail = NULL;
+ WARN_ON(tty->buf.head != tty->buf.tail);
+ tty->buf.head->read = tty->buf.head->commit;
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists