[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51479AAD.7040209@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:52:29 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On 03/18/2013 02:25 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Current code does not set low range for crashkernel if the user
> does not specify that.
>
> That cause regressions on system that does not support intel_iommu
> properly.
>
> Chao said that his system does work well on 3.8 without extra parameter.
> even iommu does not work with kdump.
>
> Set crashkernel_low automatically if the user does not specify that.
>
> For system that does support IOMMU with kdump properly, user could
> specify crashkernel_low=0 to save that 72M low ram.
>
> -v3: add swiotlb_size() according to Konrad.
>
> Reported-by: WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Can we get a bit more of an explanation instead of "and etc 8M"? At
least a hint of what kind of objects would go in there...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists