linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/75] 3.8.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKocOOOXUYv26FYEbM4sjviWPmUEAJFeFN7N9fdHqRRB3XK9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:00:32 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/75] 3.8.4-stable review

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:09:11PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> >> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.8.4 release.
>> >> > There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> >> > let me know.
>> >> >
>> >> > Responses should be made by Wed Mar 20 21:04:55 UTC 2013.
>> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >> >
>> >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.8.4-rc1.gz
>> >> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > greg k-h
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Here is the warn from 3.8.4-rc1
>> >> [  700.009112] Component: resume devices, time: 10004
>> >> [  700.009204] Modules linked in: ip6table_filter ip6_tables
>> >> ebtable_nat ebtables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state
>> >> nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp
>> >> iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables bridge stp llc bnep rfcomm bluetooth
>> >> arc4 iwldvm snd_hda_codec_analog radeon snd_hda_intel mac80211
>> >> coretemp snd_hda_codec kvm_intel kvm snd_hwdep binfmt_misc snd_pcm
>> >> snd_seq_midi iwlwifi snd_rawmidi ttm snd_seq_midi_event cfg80211
>> >> drm_kms_helper pata_pcmcia snd_seq tpm_infineon drm psmouse snd_timer
>> >> joydev pcmcia snd_seq_device snd yenta_socket tpm_tis microcode
>> >> pcmcia_rsrc pcmcia_core ppdev dm_multipath i2c_algo_bit video hp_wmi
>> >> mac_hid sparse_keymap serio_raw soundcore snd_page_alloc lpc_ich wmi
>> >> hp_accel lis3lv02d input_polldev parport_pc lp parport firewire_ohci
>> >> sdhci_pci sdhci firewire_core crc_itu_t e1000e
>> >> [  700.009212] Pid: 2637, comm: bash Not tainted 3.8.4-rc1+ #8
>> >
>> > Do you get this same warning on 3.9-rc3?
>> >
>> > I thought I got all of the needed fixes for this warning, what am I
>> > missing here?
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> I think this is a new one. You did pull in the two patches you needed.
>> I am getting ready to test it in 3.9.0-rc1. Will let you know in a
>> bit. I have to do a git pull for the latest and do a compile.
>
> Please try 3.9-rc3, -rc1 didn't have the original patch that caused the
> warning to show up in it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Seeing the same on 3.9-rc3. I reverted the three commits and re-ran
the test, still see the same warnings. From what I can tell, this
warning on my test system has nothing to do with these commits.

6c4d3bc99b3341067775efd4d9d13cc8e655fd7c
2a6e06b2aed6995af401dcd4feb5e79a0c7ea554
1d9d8639c063caf6efc2447f5f26aa637f844ff6

With this warning resolved to be an existing condition on my test
system, 3.0.70-rc1, 3.4.37-rc1, and 3.8.4-rc1 booted on both my test
systems and cross-compile tests passed. dmesgs look good and no
regressions from the previous round.

Please let me know if I should do the revert test on 3.0.70-rc1,
3.4.37-rc1, and 3.8.4-rc1. I can get to that tomorrow.

Thanks,
-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/