linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] virtio-scsi: redo allocation of target data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130319065700.GB31573@hj.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:57:00 +0800
From:	Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
To:	Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, JBottomley@...allels.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] virtio-scsi: redo allocation of target data

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:43:58AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> 
> virtio_scsi_target_state is now empty, but we will find new uses
> for it in the next few patches.  However, dropping the sglist lets
> us turn the array-of-pointers into a simple array, which simplifies
> the allocation.
> 
> However, we do not leave the virtio_scsi_target_state structs in the
> flexible array member at the end of struct virtio_scsi, because
> we will place the virtqueues there in the next patches.
> 
> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 45 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index 6307099..75ccde1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct virtio_scsi {
>  	/* Get some buffers ready for event vq */
>  	struct virtio_scsi_event_node event_list[VIRTIO_SCSI_EVENT_LEN];
>  
> -	struct virtio_scsi_target_state *tgt[];
> +	struct virtio_scsi_target_state *tgt;
>  };
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *virtscsi_cmd_cache;
> @@ -568,18 +568,9 @@ static void virtscsi_init_vq(struct virtio_scsi_vq *virtscsi_vq,
>  	virtscsi_vq->vq = vq;
>  }
>  
> -static struct virtio_scsi_target_state *virtscsi_alloc_tgt(
> -	struct virtio_device *vdev, int sg_elems)
> +static void virtscsi_init_tgt(struct virtio_scsi_target_state *tgt)
>  {
> -	struct virtio_scsi_target_state *tgt;
> -	gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL;
> -
> -	tgt = kmalloc(sizeof(*tgt), gfp_mask);
> -	if (!tgt)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  	spin_lock_init(&tgt->tgt_lock);
> -	return tgt;
>  }
>  
>  static void virtscsi_scan(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> @@ -593,17 +584,10 @@ static void virtscsi_remove_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
>  	struct Scsi_Host *sh = virtio_scsi_host(vdev);
>  	struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = shost_priv(sh);
> -	u32 i, num_targets;
>  
>  	/* Stop all the virtqueues. */
>  	vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> -
> -	num_targets = sh->max_id;
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++) {
> -		kfree(vscsi->tgt[i]);
> -		vscsi->tgt[i] = NULL;
> -	}
> -
> +	kfree(vscsi->tgt);
>  	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>  }
>  
> @@ -612,7 +596,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>  {
>  	int err;
>  	struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
> -	u32 i, sg_elems;
> +	u32 i;
>  
>  	vq_callback_t *callbacks[] = {
>  		virtscsi_ctrl_done,
> @@ -640,16 +624,14 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>  	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_F_HOTPLUG))
>  		virtscsi_kick_event_all(vscsi);
>  
> -	/* We need to know how many segments before we allocate.  */
> -	sg_elems = virtscsi_config_get(vdev, seg_max) ?: 1;

The drop of sg_elems does not belong to this patch. It should be done in
'virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_add_sgs for command buffers'.

> -	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++) {
> -		vscsi->tgt[i] = virtscsi_alloc_tgt(vdev, sg_elems);
> -		if (!vscsi->tgt[i]) {
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> +	vscsi->tgt = kmalloc(num_targets * sizeof(vscsi->tgt[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vscsi->tgt) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_targets; i++)
> +		virtscsi_init_tgt(&vscsi->tgt[i]);
> +
>  	err = 0;
>  
>  out:
> @@ -668,10 +650,7 @@ static int virtscsi_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	/* Allocate memory and link the structs together.  */
>  	num_targets = virtscsi_config_get(vdev, max_target) + 1;
> -	shost = scsi_host_alloc(&virtscsi_host_template,
> -		sizeof(*vscsi)
> -		+ num_targets * sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_target_state));
> -
> +	shost = scsi_host_alloc(&virtscsi_host_template, sizeof(*vscsi));
>  	if (!shost)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.2.rc2
> 

-- 
Asias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/