[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28283.1363691050@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:04:10 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apw@...onical.com,
nbd@...nwrt.org, neilb@...e.de, jordipujolp@...il.com,
ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu, sedat.dilek@...glemail.com,
hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] vfs: export do_splice_direct() to modules
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > BTW, I wonder what's the right locking for that sucker; overlayfs is
> > probably too heavy - we are talking about copying a file from one fs to
> > another, which can obviously take quite a while, so holding ->i_mutex on
> > _parent_ all along is asking for very serious contention.
>
> Copy up is a once-in-a-lifetime event for an object. Optimizing it is
> way down in the list of things to do. I'd drop splice in a jiffy if
> it's in the way.
Yes, but it could block the parent directory for a long time. I suspect it's
fine if you can RCU walk through the parent, but if you have to grab a lock on
it...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists