linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363697906.21184.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:58:26 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len
 computation for untrusted packets

On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 05:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> > I believe before doing header check for untrusted packets, the only
> > thing we can trust is skb->len and that's we've used before
> > 1def9238d4aa2. But after that, we're trying to use unchecked or
> > meaningless value (e.g gso_segs were reset to zero in
> > tun/macvtap/packet), and guest then can utilize this to result a very
> > huge (-1U) pkt_len by filling evil value in the header. Can all kinds of
> > packet scheduler survive this kinds of possible DOS?
> 
> I would use the flow dissector to fix the transport header from all
> DODGY providers.
> 
> Daniel Borkmann is working on a patch serie adding nhoff into flow_keys,
> and adding __skb_get_poff(const struct sk_buff *skb), for a BPF
> extension we talked about in Copenhagen / Netfilter Workshop.
> 
> You could then set the transport header offset to the right value.
> 
> (and drop evil packets before they go further in the stack)
> 
> if (gso_packet(skb)) {
> 	u32 poff = __skb_get_poff(skb);
> 
> 	if (!poff) {
> 		drop_evil_packet(skb);
> 	} else {
> 		skb_set_transport_header(skb, poff);
> 		...
> 	}
> }


Oh well, no need to use __skb_get_poff() but plain skb_flow_dissect()
(once patched to include thoff in struct flow_keys)

struct flow_keys keys;

if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
	goto drop;

if ((gso_type & (SKB_GSO_TCPV4|SKB_GSO_TCPV6)) &&
    keys.ip_proto != IP_PROTO_TCP)
	goto drop;

skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/