linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363701741.22553.46.camel@laptop>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:02:21 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in
 rebalance_domains()

On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
> then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
> return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.

No real objection I suppose, but did you actually see this go wrong?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/